MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7013913956

OCROTIREA PĂRINTEASCĂ ÎN DREPTUL INTERNAŢIONAL PRIVAT: ASPECTE COMPARATIVE

2011· article· en· W7013913956 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWater Resources and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLegislationObligationConstitutionNormativeVirtueCommon lawThe RepublicStatutory law
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The underage is the person who by virtue of his young age, needs a special protection from those around him, but first of all from his parents. This issue is included in the majority of official normative documents, including the Constitution of Republic of Moldova, which stipulates in article nr. 53 that every child is assured with the observance of his legitimate rights and interests, furthermore the protection of them is guaranteed by parents or those who act in name of parents, or in cases stipulated by law – by public prosecutor, the tutelage authority or by other public representatives. In other words, the first persons who are called to assure and guarantee the child’s rights and legal interests are his parents. The parents’ protection is an obligation regulated by law. Nowadays in the legislation of other countries as Romania, Belgium, Turkey or Quebec as a synonym for the notion “parental protection” one use the notion of “parental authority” and is explained as the aggregate of rights and obligations which concern both the person and the child’s goods which belong in equal amount to his parents and which are applied in the direct superior interest of the child. The duration of the parents authority is established for a term since the child is in coming of age.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.514
GPT teacher head0.591
Teacher spread0.076 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicWater Resources and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207