MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7013925894

Oral History Interview with Paul Dillon

2003· article· en· W7013925894 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Portal to Texas History (University of North Texas) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicOral History, Memory, Narrative Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNavyOral historyNational guardCoast guardGeorge (robot)World War IIGraduation (instrument)Guard (computer science)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Museum of the Pacific War presents an oral interview with Paul Dillon. Dillon was in the army until he was discharged in September 1941 after being seriously injured from being run over by a military vehicle. He held various jobs until June 1942 at which time he entered the Navy and trained at Norfolk, Virginia. Upon graduation he was selected for gunnery school at Little Creek, Virginia. After training he was sent to the Brooklyn Armed Guard Center for assignment. Recalling his assignment as a naval gunner on the SS Jacob Luckenbach (1918), he tells of taking a shipment of planes and parts to Persia for shipment to Russia. On his next trip he was on a ship equipped with an experimental type of anti-torpedo gear called M-29. His next assignment was aboard the SS John A. Poor (1943). He recalls an explosion (mines) that knocked out the engine. As a consequence the ship was dead until sea-going tugs towed the ship to Halifax for repairs. He also describes the ship being torpedoed on 19 March 1944 off of the coast of Ceylon. Of the 106 assigned to the ship, only 39 survived. The survivors were picked up by the SS John Walch and taken to Colombia, Ceylon. In January 1945 Dillon was sent to the Philippines for assignment to the USS Dobbin (AD-3). The ship returned to the United States in November 1945 and he was discharged.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.154 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Portal to Texas History (University of North Texas)Same topicOral History, Memory, Narrative AnalysisFrench-language works237,207