MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014021961

O pripovedovalcu v dveh srednjeevropskih postmodernističnih romanih

2015· article· sl· W7014021961 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueRepository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagesl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Cultural Memory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsMiddle AgesAncient egypt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Prispevek obravnava v madžarski in slovenski knjoževnosti uveljavljena postmodernistična romana Pétra Esterházyja in Andreja Blatnika ter ju postavlja v kontekst povojnega literarnega razvoja. Skupne so jima mnoge značilnosti postmodernizma, od številnih citatov, ki v drugačnem okolju dobijo nov, ironičen pomen, do pripovedovalca, ki simulira različne tipe pripovedovalca, temeljna razlika pa je, da je Esterházyjev roman odprto delo, medtem ko je Blatnikov roman bolj klasičen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.009
Science and technology studies0.0040.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.139 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRepository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)Same topicLiterature and Cultural MemoryFrench-language works237,207