Optimizing Boron and Molybdenum Delivery for Contrasting Cultivars of Subirrigated, Greenhouse-grown Pot Chrysanthemums
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Greenhouse floriculture operations must produce high‐yielding, quality flowers while minimizing environmental risk. I hypothesized that boron and molybdenum delivery to modern cultivars of subirrigated chrysanthemum can be optimized, compared to industry standards, while maintaining plant yield and quality. Two experiments were conducted for each micronutrient in a naturally‐lit greenhouse using a randomized complete block split‐plot design. Boron (5.00–0.313 μmol L–1) or molybdenum (0.50–0.031 μmol L–1), corresponding to 100–6.25% of current industry standards, was supplied in an otherwise balanced nutrient solution during vegetative growth only. Plant/flower morphology and development, visible symptoms of nutrient deficiency, and tissue nutrient levels indicated that boron and molybdenum supplies could be successfully reduced by 75–94% through improved nutrient use efficiency. This research contributes to the development of a sustainable low‐input nutrient delivery strategy for floricultural operations, wherein nutrient supply is interrupted during reproductive growth and optimized during vegetative growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".