MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014149082

Operationalizing the gift of love (GOL) in interpersonal reconstructive therapy (IRT): An examination of the role of meaning reconstruction in therapeutic change.

2022· article· en· W7014149082 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJMU Scholoraly Commons (James Madison University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicTransactional Analysis in Psychotherapy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpiritualityOperationalizationCoping (psychology)Meaning (existential)PersonalityInterpersonal communicationPsychopathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy (IRT) (Benjamin, 2003/2006) is an integrative, principles-based treatment approach and theory of psychopathology that conceptualizes the motivating factor that underlies personality psychopathology as the gift of love (GOL). That is, copy processes are learned and maintained to achieve psychic proximity to the important people and their internalized representations (IPIRs) that were the original teachers. Relinquishing this gift of love allows a person to re-orient their life towards uncovering and living by their own individually held meanings that will then define how they relate to themselves and their world. Spirituality and religion have historically helped individuals make meaning of and endure some of life’s most trying events (Canada et al., 2016; Hawthorne et al., 2015; Lichtenthal et al., 2010; Johnson & Zitzmann, 2020). Furthermore, Park and Folkman (1997) and others have studied how spirituality can play a large role in a person’s meaning-making processes. The ability to make meaning out of a stressful situation has been shown to promote adaptation and well-being. This study asserts that the process of understanding and learning to let go of the gift of love is inherently a spiritual task. Studies involving IRT have not yet considered explicitly spiritual coping and its connections to the gift of love. This study created a coding system based on existing theory that reliably detects the gift of love as well as spiritual coping in an archived IRT dataset. Results indicated that the presence of spiritual coping, particularly positive spiritual coping, was significantly associated with higher levels of adherence to IRT. In addition, this study revealed that GOL is associated with personal and social spiritual coping and is positively associated with therapeutic change, as measured by GOL stages of change. Keywords: Interpersonal Reconstructive Therapy, interpersonal theory, personality disorders, religious coping, spiritual coping, therapeutic change

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.356
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it