Older audiences in the digital media environment: Spain 2016 and 2018. v1.0
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This document reports results of the first wave (2016) and the second wave (2018) of the Spanish survey for the project "Cross-national longitudinal study: Older audiences in the digital media environment." The project's overall goal is to build and analyze a panel of older audiences in a set of countries (i.e., Austria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Israel, the Netherlands, Romania, and Spain). The project's fieldwork takes place from 2016 to 2020, and data collection is planned on a biannual basis. Supported by the ACT project (http://actproject.ca), the panel study expands both Nimrod's (2017) work and that conducted within the EU COST Action IS0906 "Transforming Audiences, Transforming Societies." The study's main objectives are identifying and analyzing media consumption habits and usage repertoires of older audiences, namely, how traditional and dominant media, on the one hand, and new media, on the other, are articulated in practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it