MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7014294719

OXYGEN AND CARBON ISOTOPE GEOCHEMISTRY OF LATE ORDOVICIAN BRACHIOPODS FROM ANTICOSTI ISLAND, QUEBEC

2008· article· en· W7014294719 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueScholarship@Western (Western University) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrdovicianIsotopes of oxygenIsotopes of carbonBalticaBayCarbon fibersStable isotope ratioExcursion
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The δ13C and δ180 values and elemental compositions of 29 Late Ordovician (Hirnantian Stage) shells from eight different brachiopod species from the Ellis Bay Formation, Anticosti Island, Quebec, were measured to evaluate their fidelity of chemical and isotopic preservation. Three groups of Mendacella shells from three separate Hirnantian time periods were also analyzed to provide δ C and δ O curves for this time interval. Significant differences in δ C and δ 0 values among species, shells of the same species, and within individual shells from early to late growth stages suggest that original isotopic compositions were retained. Differences in chemical compositions between shell-matrix and shell-cement boundaries also suggest minimal alteration. These brachiopods are therefore deemed suitable proxies for the δ C and δ 0 values of Hirnantian seawater. The carbon and oxygen isotope compositions of Mendacella are consistent with previous studies. A large, positive excursion at the end-Hirnantian is suggestive of a cooling event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScholarship@Western (Western University)→Same topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils→French-language works237,207→