MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014330106

"Piotruś Pan w Ogrodach Kensingtońskich" Jamesa Matthew Barriego

2019· other· en· W7014330106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepozytorium Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza (Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań) · 2019
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterpretation (philosophy)BiographyReflexive pronounSection (typography)Exposition (narrative)Performance art
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

„All children, except one, grow up”. Among all the authors of global classic literature for children James Matthew Barrie is definitely an outstanding writer, known as the creator of the story about Peter Pan – the boy who would not grow up and who lives on the fantastical island of Neverland. However, the eternal boy not always lived on Never Never Land – although he is (and forever will be) „young”, he is not devoid of the past: his story begins in Kensington Gardens. The present MA thesis is divided into three parts. The opening part is an interpretative essay, in the first instance devoted to James Matthew Barrie himself (who’s biography – unknown in Poland – is essential to understand his work). Subsequently the essay considers textual and generic flexibility of Peter Pan and presents a comprehensive interpretation of Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens (1906) – Barrie’s very first work dedicated to the boy who would not grow up, which somehow forms the origin and prefiguration of famous Peter Pan and Wendy (1911); finally, it offers an exploration of various mythological, cultural and literary motives from which the figure of Peter Pan originates. The second section of the present MA thesis is a piece of literary translation criticism; it focuses on the two existing Polish translations of Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens: Przygody Piotrusia Pana (1913) by Zofia Rogoszówna and Piotruś Pan w Ogrodach Kensingtońskich (1991) by Maciej Słomczyński. This part consists of a comparative analysis of translations mentioned above; the main challenges that Barrie’s works pose to the translator are highlighted here and translation strategies adopted by Rogoszówna and Słomczyński are critically compared. The third part – central and the most extensive – presents the new translation of Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens, prepared by the author of the present MA thesis in the 110th anniversary of the publication of the original text. The translation is accompanied by Arthur Rackham’s Edwardian illustrations which perfectly capture Barrie’s elusive and whimsical genius, and by the brief afterward written by the youngest translator of Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.002
Bibliometrics0.0080.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0050.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.024

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it