MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014422980

The potential for waterbirds to act as a vector for zooplankton dispersal in the North Island, New Zealand

2023· dissertation· en· W7014422980 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Commons (University of Waikato) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZooplanktonBiological dispersalDiapauseTrophic levelAbundance (ecology)Freshwater ecosystem
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Zooplankton are essential components of freshwater ecosystems by controlling algal growth and sustaining higher trophic levels. Freshwater zooplankton are geographically isolated and are incapable of active dispersal to new freshwater sites. The dispersal of zooplankton can occur through natural dispersal vectors (e.g., wind, rain or waterfowl) or through human-mediated dispersal vectors (e.g., accidental or deliberate introductions). Dispersal of zooplankton is vital for maintaining gene flow between isolated sites and colonising new habitats. Zooplankton diapause eggs are well suited for dispersal as they are resistant to harsh conditions, e.g., digestion, drying and freezing. Diapause eggs increase the chance of survival in unfavourable conditions and are an important part of a zooplankton’s life cycle. This paper analyses New Zealand waterbirds’ dispersal of zooplankton internally (endozoochory) and externally (ectozoochory). 
\n
\nThis study quantified the dispersal of zooplankton internally (endozoochory) using the faecal droppings collected from waterbirds at two New Zealand Lakes. Faecal droppings were collected from Mallard Ducks, Canadian Geese, Greylag Geese, Black Swans and Australian Coots from Lake Rotoroa and Lake Rotorua. A total of 50 eggs were found in the faecal droppings of waterbirds, with a mean number of 0.75 eggs found per dropping. These results indicate that waterbirds are consuming zooplankton eggs. However, no significant difference was observed in the propagule count among waterbird species. Therefore it was unlikely that the waterbird species impacted the abundance or viability of diapause eggs. 
\n
\nThe sediment experiment showed zooplankton are inhabiting the shores of Lake Rotorua and Lake Rotoroa, where waterbirds are likely to come in contact with diapause located within the sediment. In Lake Rotorua, diapausing eggs from six species of rotifers, cladocerans, copepods and ostracods hatched from the littoral sediments. Strikingly, no hatching was observed in the littoral sediments from Lake Rotoroa. These results suggest that diapausing eggs are readily available to be picked up by waterbirds for external dispersal (ectozoochory). This study quantified the potential for zooplankton to be dispersed by waterbirds internally (endozoochory) and externally (ectozoochory). Results suggest that waterbird dispersal of zooplankton is occurring, but the numbers being transported are low. Although, the transport of a few individuals may be enough to achieve gene flow. Waterbirds are not be the primary vector for the dispersal of zooplankton. Human-mediated contributions e.g., shipping-related activities (ballast tanks), may play a more significant role than waterbirds in the dispersal of zooplankton.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.724
Threshold uncertainty score0.974

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it