Pouvoir et frontières sociales dans l'exercice de la recherche
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pouvoir et frontieres sociales dans l'exercice de la recherche II n'y a pas longtemps, je donnais un cours de 2e cycle qui portait sur !es methodes de recherche interpretivistes, ethnographiques et qualitatives.Ma demarche consistait a prendre comme point de depart !es questions de recherche des,etudiantes et des etudiants, afin de !es amener a voir comment !es questions, Je cadre conceptuel et !es methodes de recherche sont interrelies.Nous etions donc a la premiere etape, et !es membres du cours presentaient chacune et chacun leur domaine d'interet.Une personne, d'origine canadienne, a explique que son interet academique provenait de son experience anterieure comme professeur d'anglais dans une ecole au Japon.Elle pensait avoir observe au sein de cette ecole des GRENZGNGE 7 (2000), H. 13, 9-15.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".