Pédagogie interculturelle : des stratégies d'enseignement pour tous les types de cours
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cette recherche action-formation intitulée Des stratégies d'enseignement en interculturel a été menée dans le cadre du programme PAREA1.Dans le cadre de cette recherche action-formation, nous avons élaboré, validé et implanté 68 activités éducatives partagées en trois thèmes et en 12 stratégies d'enseignement.Les trois thèmes sur lesquels nous avons travaillé sont liés à l'acquisition de con naissances en interculturel, au développement, chez les élèves, d'habiletés à la communication interculturelle et au développement, chez les professeurs, d'habiletés à la gestion de classe pluriethnique.Nous présenterons d'abord les 12 stratégies d'enseignement sur lesquelles nous avons travaillé; nous présenterons ensuite brièvement les aspects méthodologiques qui ont supporté la recherche.Trois activités éducatives seront pro posées et quelques résultats préliminaires seront exposés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.017 | 0.009 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".