MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014518155

Post-Transplant Liver Monitoring Utilizing Integrated Surface-Enhanced Raman and AI in Hepatic Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury Animal Model

2025· article· en· W7014518155 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsPediatric Oncology Group
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal modelRaman spectroscopyLiver transplantationAnimal studyConvergence (economics)TransplantationFilter (signal processing)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sanghwa Lee,1,* Hyunhee Kwon,2,* Jeongmin Oh,3 Kyeong Ryeol Kim,3 Joonseup Hwang,3 Suyeon Kang,3 Kwanhee Lee,3 Jung-Man Namgoong,2 Jun Ki Kim1,3 1Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea; 2Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea; 3Department of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jun Ki Kim, Department of Convergence Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea, Email kim@amc.seoul.kr Jung-Man Namgoong, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea, Email namgoong2940@naver.comBackground: While liver transplantation saves lives from irreversible liver damage, it poses challenges such as graft dysfunction due to factors like ischemia-reperfusion (IR) injury, which can lead to significant cellular damage and systemic complications. Current diagnostic tools for detecting IR injury have limitations, necessitating advanced methods for timely intervention. This study explores the integration of surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) with artificial intelligence (AI) to improve diagnostic accuracy for liver IR injury.Materials and Methods: IR injury was induced using a mouse model, and histopathological and hepatic functional evaluations were conducted alongside SERS measurements. Raman signals obtained via SERS chips, which selectively filter nano-biomarkers and enhance signals, were analyzed using machine learning algorithms.Results: The PC-LDA derived from spectra achieved an accuracy of 93.13%, while a machine learning algorithm based on PC-derived PLS-DA improved accuracy to 98.75%.Discussion: Our findings emphasize the potential of combining SERS with AI to detect and specifically identify dysfunction due to liver damage early, potentially advancing patient management in liver transplantation. Keywords: liver ischemia-reperfusion injury, liver function, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, discriminant analysis, machine learning algorithm

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.527
Teacher spread0.447 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207