Poemas para crianças e adolescentes em programas escolares e universitários?
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The programs and goals for Portuguese in Elementary and Secondary Schools indicate, concerning literary education, from the 7th grade onwards, only so-called poets for adults, in the expectation that students thus acquire linguistic and literary maturity. Also the programs of Portuguese Literature or Foreign Literature taught at Portuguese Universities, do not indicate poets who wrote or write for children or teenagers assuming that the regression to texts written for "younger" ages is inappropriate. Several questions arise: Are poems written for children or teenagers aesthetically inferior to the lyrical texts written for adults? Are texts in verse intended for children and teenagers (still) poems? Do such texts deserve to be read in Elementary and Secondary schools? Taking as paradigm the poem Consulta, by Maria Alberta Menéres, this essay intends to show that poems primarily intended for children or teenagers reveal, under apparently rudimentary content and form, an exquisite poetic construction, refining thought and sensibility of young and adult readers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it