MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014558772

Planned Parenthood sues Arkansas over Medicaid funding cuts

2015· other· en· W7014558772 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet Archive (Internet Archive) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicaidGovernorQuarter (Canadian coin)PaymentState (computer science)Family planning
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Planned Parenthood's suing Arkansas for cutting its Medicaid funding. The Republican governor'd ordered the Medicaid contract canceled because of videos made by an anti-abortion group--- they claimed Planned Parent hood was selling aborted fetal tissue. Planned Parenthood's lawsuit's asking a judge to block the cancellation. Its C-E-O for the Heartland says Arkansas needs healthcare, not more politics. She points out that the state only has two clinics, but they saw more than four thousand patients last fiscal year and about a quarter of them were on Medicaid. Arkansas says Planned Parenthood's gotten more than 51-thousand dollars in Medicaid payments over the past fiscal year. But that was all for family planning and medical services, not abortions. The governor says he expected the lawsuit....but he feels he did the right thing to \reflect Arkansas' values\.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0530.056

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet Archive (Internet Archive)French-language works237,207