Reconstruction with resilience capacity: The historic city centre of Constitucion site of the 2010 earthquake and tsunami disaster Reconstruir con capacidad de resiliencia: El casco histórico de la ciudad de Constitución y el sitio del desastre del terrem
Bibliographic record
Abstract
© 2014, Instituto de la Vivienda. All rights reserved.Constitucion was one of the cities worst affected by the 2010 earthquake and tsunami. Some of the houses located in the historic quarter of this city were damaged and destroyed and its social cohesion was fractured after the relocation of victims, particularly those from the La Poza district. Four years after the disaster, change has been slow and reconstruction deadlines have been questioned. The rebuilding of the historic center has been possible thanks to individual private initiatives by residents, trade restructuration and —to a lesser extent— Governmental interventions through the improvement and repair of dwellings and the restoration of the coastal area. Most of the reconstruction process has focused on the construction of new housing units in the area outside the historic quarter. This paper discusses the scope of the process, the main changes in the urban structure and the value of property. The underlying hypothesis is th
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".