Poincaré descriptors for identifying hemiparesis in acute stroke using wearable accelerometry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stroke survivors are often characterized by hemiparesis, i.e., paralysis in one half of the body, that severely affects upper limb movements. Continuous monitoring of the progression of hemiparesis requires manual observation of the limb movements at regular intervals and hence is a labour intensive process. In this work, we use wrist-worn accelerometers for automated assessment of hemiparetic severity in acute stroke patients through bivariate Poincaré analysis between accelerometer data from the two hands during spontaneous and instructed movements. Experiments show that while the bivariate Poincaré descriptors CSD1 and CSD2 can identify hemiparetic patients from control subjects, a novel descriptor called Complex Cross-Correlation Measure (C3M) can distinguish between moderate and severe hemiparesis. Further, we justify the use of C3M by showing that it is described by multiple-lag cross-correlations, representing the co-ordination of activity between two hands. The descriptors are compared against the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), the clinical gold standard for evaluation of hemiparetic severity, and studied using statistical tests for developing supervised models for hemiparesis classification.Clinical relevance-This study establishes the suitability of wrist-worn accelerometers in identifying hemiparetic severity in stroke patients through novel descriptors of hand co-ordination.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".