Piles embedded in soft clay located below the water table subjected to lateral cyclic loadings: Sensitivity analysis.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents the theoretical formulation and numerical investigations of sensitivity analysis of laterally loaded piles embedded in soft clay located below the water table. Single piles with various lengths and boundaries subjected to cyclic lateral forces and bending moments are analyzed. The groups of 3 x 3 piles with various spacing (2D, 3D, 4D, and 5D) are also analyzed in this study. For single piles, the pile structure is considered as one-dimensional beam and the supporting soft clay is defined by means of p-y model. For groups of piles, the pile members are considered as one-dimensional beams and the pile cap is considered as plate finite elements. The behaviour of a pile-soil-pile system in the pile group is simulated by means of p-y relationship modified by the fm factor that is dependent on the spacing of the groups of piles and the location of the pile member in a group of piles. The pile stiffness and characteristics of soil p-y relationship are taken as the design variables. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 42-01, page: 0287. Adviser: B. B. Budkowska. Thesis (M.A.Sc.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 2003.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".