MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7014678519

Recharge estimation from return flow on irrigated land in the Assiniboine Delta Aquifer

2022· dissertation· en· W7014678519 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueMspace (University of Manitoba) · 2022
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGroundwater rechargeHydrology (agriculture)Return flowAquiferGroundwaterIrrigationGroundwater modelGroundwater flowDepression-focused recharge
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Assiniboine Delta Aquifer (ADA) is the largest unconfined aquifer and the main water supply for agricultural production in Manitoba, Canada. Groundwater has a critical role in irrigated agriculture to ensure food security, and aquifer recharge is a key to groundwater management. While aquifers are primarily recharged from rainfall and surface sources, return flow from irrigation water can recharge during cropping seasons. The previous studies on the ADA used the water budget method to estimate the recharge but not return flow through irrigation. In this study, both the groundwater recharge and return flow through irrigation water to the ADA were estimated numerically by using HYDRUS-1D. The data were retrieved from soil sensors and weather stations installed at each selected site. This study used three stations on cropland, and three on pastureland. The soil properties used to construct the numerical models were determined by laboratory experiments and retrieved from the Canada-Manitoba Crop Diversification Centre (CMCDC). The numerical models were calibrated by altering the van Genuchten-Mualem (VGM) parameters to match the observed and estimated soil water content. This modelling step was carried out by coupling HYDRUS-1D with Pareto Archived Dynamically Dimensioned Search (PA-DDS) using MATLAB. The results of this research showed that the estimated groundwater recharge based on simulations for the 2019 and 2020 cropping seasons was significantly higher than reported in previous studies and that the return flow on the irrigated cropland positively impacted the groundwater recharge. Return flow was higher in 2019 which was considered a normal year and reduces strongly in the dry year of 2020. The outcomes would be beneficial for new water licensing, an increase in agricultural production, and more importantly, sustainable groundwater management of the Assiniboine Delta Aquifer by limiting the environmental impact from the irrigation withdrawals .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.837
Threshold uncertainty score0.325

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMspace (University of Manitoba)→Same topicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies→French-language works237,207→