Quelle posture professionnelle pour l'enseignant d'Éthique et culture religieuse?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’enseignant d’Éthique et culture religieuse, depuis la mise en place du programme en 2008 dans les écoles du Québec, est appelé à relever d’importants défis inhérents à son rôle professionnel. Si un devoir de neutralité lui incombe officiellement, la posture lui permettant d’aborder les questions relatives à la différence culturelle n’est pourtant pas clairement définie. C’est à la lumière d’orientations ministérielle telles que les finalités du programme d’ÉCR et via la définition de concepts clés comme la laïcité, le relativisme et l’universalisme que l’auteure s’emploie à préciser la posture de l’enseignant d’ÉCR. Cette dernière propose, au terme de sa démarche, la conception de « neutralité mesurée » qui, basée sur des considérations pratiques, vise à soutenir les enseignants dans leur pratique. Cette perspective, s’arrimant aux visées de l’État québécois, se place en amont d’une gestion pluraliste de la diversité et de la mise en application des valeurs communes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.032 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".