MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014745572

Quri: galletas de avena enriquecidas con cushuro

2019· dissertation· en· W7014745572 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

Venuerenati · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Food Production Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConsumption (sociology)Investment (military)CashProduction (economics)Natural (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The many occupations that people perform daily do not allow them to dedicate themselves to the activities that are fundamental to lead a healthy lifestyle. One of these activities is food, the same one that has been neglected, which, added to the proliferation of fast foods, generates a nutritional deficit in society.
\nThis business is the development and marketing of a nutritious snack enriched with cushuro, in the form of cookies, which seeks to help reduce the effects of the reality that is currently being experienced. The main source of income will be the sale of these cookies to people who consider it necessary to improve their nutrition.
\nFor the start-up of the project an initial investment of S / 89,847.00 is needed, which will be paid by 60% by the creators of the project and an investor who is willing to contribute the remaining 40% is looked for.
\nAccording to projected cash flows, within the last quarter of the first year of operations, the project starts generating profits, so the recovery of the total amount invested is guaranteed, plus the respective profit, at the end of the 3 years the project lasts.
\nIt is considered that the business is viable because there is a growing tendency on the part of people to care for their food, so the consumption of products considered natural and nutritious is increasing significantly in the market.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.875

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuerenatiSame topicAgricultural and Food Production StudiesFrench-language works237,207