The relationship between early maladaptive schemas and severity of symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome: Mediating role of alexithymia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of the common and chronic functional gastrointestinal disorders that cause a great burden for the patients and the society. Therefore, investigation of psychological variables related to IBS can be useful in understanding, management and decrees of symptoms severity in IBS patients. The present study was performed to examine the mediating role of alexithymia on the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and severity of symptoms in patients with irritable bowel syndrome. One hundred and eighty patients with irritable bowel syndrome (114 men, 66 women) participated in this study. All patients were asked to complete the IBS symptom severity scale (IBS-SSS), young schema questionnaire-short form (YSQ-SF), and Toronto Alexithymia scale (TAS-20). The results demonstrated that early maladaptive schemas and alexithymia had a significant positive association with severity of IBS symptoms )p<0.05). Also early maladaptive schemas had a significant positive association with alexithymia )p<0.01). The results showed that alexithymia did not play a mediating role on the relationship between early maladaptive schemas and IBS severity of symptoms. According to the results of the present study, it can be concluded that early maladaptive schemas and alexithymia can predict severity of IBS symptoms. Considering these psychological variables would be helpful in the processes of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of IBS
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".