MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014940325

Research partnerships: The ARUC-ES and RQRP-ES model

2007· book· en· W7014940325 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Development Resource Network (HDRNet) · 2007
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeneral partnershipAllianceSocial economyStrategic allianceSocial PartnershipCirculation (fluid dynamics)Social network (sociolinguistics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The University-Community Research Alliance in Social Economy (ARUC-ÉS from its French acronym) and the Quebec Research Partnership Network in Social Economy (RQRP-ÉS) are research partnership centres authoring this document in which they discuss the characteristics and conditions that facilitate research partnerships in social economy in terms of working methods, circulation and transfers of research-based knowledge. The aim of the present document is to share the experience of the Alliance and the Réseau with those who are interested in research practices carried out in partnership, and to promote university research for practitioners.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.020
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.074

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.020
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.019
Scholarly communication0.0140.022
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.193
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Development Resource Network (HDRNet)Same topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207