MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7014976243

The river : the relevance of craft disciplines in our information technology-driven society

2005· dissertation· en· W7014976243 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2005
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCrafts, Textile, and Design
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCraftRelevance (law)Common groundEmotiveWork (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'auteur a accord une licence non exclusive permettant la Bibliothque et Archives Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public par tlcommunication ou par l'Internet, prter, distribuer et vendre des thses partout dans le monde, des fins commerciales ou autres, sur support microforme, papier, lectronique et/ou autres formats.L'auteur conserve la proprit du droit d'auteur et des droits moraux qui protge cette thse.Ni la thse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent tre imprims ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation.Conformment la loi canadienne sur la protection de la vie prive, quelques formulaires secondaires ont t enlevs de cette thse.Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans la pagination, il n'y aura aucun contenu manquant. AclrnowledgemenlsBehind the backstage curtains of my thesis work stand a list of people to whom proper thanks is due.Pirst and foremost 1 would like to give thanks to Dr. Elizabeth Wood for her support and guidance throughout the long jouroey of my Masters degree.Elizabeth, you have allowed me to grow as a writer in a most creative, organic and intuitive manner always respecting my personal vision and heartfelt conceros.Time and time again you have offered me sage academic and intellectual direction all the while challenging me to remain true to who 1 am as an emotive and passionate visual artist.In your office, my life as an educator, artist and writer find common ground and this common ground is now crystallized in the pages that will follow.The respect and fondness that 1 have for you stretches far beyond my work at McGill as you have made your way into my heart and 1 will cherish your friendship always.1 would like to give thanks to my husband, Drew Nener, who being a studio furoiture designer and maker, has always been able to support me in my work and struggles as a studio artist.He has, however, been exceptionally patient and accommodating with me throughout the arduous task of writing and researching for this thesis.My aspirations with regards to teaching, ceramics, treeplanting, academic work and raising our wonderful daughter J1dik6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicCrafts, Textile, and DesignFrench-language works237,207