MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7015042406

Somatostatin Receptor Type 2 Antagonism Improves Glucagon Counter-regulation in Biobreeding Diabetes-prone Rats

2013· dissertation· en· W7015042406 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace (University of Toronto) · 2013
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPancreatic function and diabetes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlucagonSomatostatin receptor 2AntagonismSomatostatinAntagonistHypoglycemiaGlucagon receptorGlucagon-like peptide 1 receptor
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Impaired counterregulation during hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes (T1D) is partly due to inadequate pancreatic islet alpha-cell glucagon secretion. We hypothesized that hypoglycemia can be prevented in autoimmune T1D by selective somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) antagonism of alpha cells to relieve SSTR2 inhibition, thereby increasing glucagon secretion. Diabetic biobreeding diabetes prone (BBDP) rats (D) vs non-diabetic BBDP (N) rats, underwent infusion of vehicle or SSTR2 antagonist (SSTR2a) during insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. D rats, treated with SSTR2a, needed little or no glucose to maintain hypoglycemia. To monitor real-time glucagon secretory response directly, we developed the technique of thin slices of the pancreas from D and N rats as well as normal human pancreas, subjected to perifusion with vehicle vs SSTR2a. SSTR2a treatment enhanced glucagon secretion in N and D rats and human pancreas. We conclude that SSTR2 antagonism can enhance hypoglycemia-stimulated glucagon release sufficient to achieve normoglycemic control.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace (University of Toronto)→Same topicPancreatic function and diabetes→French-language works237,207→