MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015064237

Soundtrack Boxing Day

2007· other· en· W7015064237 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) · 2007
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCinema and Media Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHollywoodNarrativeDocumentary filmFilmmakingPeriod (music)Popular musicVideo recordingOrder (exchange)Feature filmAction (physics)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relationship between the documentary film form and the corresponding soundtrack is largely predicated on the film’s themes and generally does not involve the music soundtrack form. The Australian feature film, Boxing Day employs high definition video to allow the narrative action to be captured in a real time documentary format, with only 4 edits throughout the piece. To musically interpret and respond to the events of this documentary narrative formed the basis of this research. Although this documentary process would not normally involve a music soundtrack, it was felt necessary by the director to add music sparingly after the filming took place. In order to preserve the intellectual integrity of the film, the soundtrack to Boxing Day created by Tom Ellard was composed and recorded music on the real Boxing Day 2006, at roughly the time when the virtual events unfold onscreen. This recording was supplied to the director for the final edit in January 2007. The Film Boxing Day has been reviewed on popular television show At the Movies, and in the publications The Age, The Sydney Morning Herald and The Hollywood Reporter. The film was shown at the Pusan International Film Festival and The Montreal Festival of New Cinema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.246
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2460.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.162 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia)Same topicCinema and Media StudiesFrench-language works237,207