MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015075311

Seychelles tuna bulletin : third quarter 1989

2013· other· en· W7015075311 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueAquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) · 2013
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFishingQuarter (Canadian coin)TunaLatitudeIndian oceanPeriod (music)Trend analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The number of purse seiners active in the Western Indian Ocean during the third quarter of 1989 increased from 46 vessels in June to 48 in July reaching an all-time high of 51 in September. The highest number of vessels previously recorded for this fishery was 49, between December 1984 to February 1985, and in early 1989. During the same period last year a maximum of 46 vessels were in operation.Poor fishing results obtained during the second quarter continued throughout July and August, with daily catch rates averaging 11-13 MT. In September, however, fishing success improved considerably with catch rates rising to 26.5 MT/day, nearly reaching the level obtained (30 MT/day during the same period last year. Skipjack remained the predominant species in the catch whereas only a slight improvement in the proportion of yellow fin was obtained, from 12% in July to 19% in September. The fishing pattern was similar to that observed in previous years; fishing activity was concentrated towards the northern end of the Seychelles EEZ, north or latitude 5 degrees south. As determined from seiner logbooks received by the 30th of September 1989 the cumulative catch by purse seiners in the Western Indian Ocean now stands at 163,252 tones for 1989.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization)French-language works237,207