Sobre a promoção da saúde na contemporaneidade: um desafio ao farmacêutico educador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the tasks and challenges of the pharmacist as a health professional, is to be an educator. When acting in the public sector, which has direct contact with system users, mainly aimed at the correct and rational use of medicines, going back to what is expected from a policy of health promotion, as recommended by the Ottawa Charter of 1986. Know is that the abuse of drugs is increasingly part of the Western culture where the prevailing malaise or any kind of suffering, then transformed into illness, should be terminated at any price with drug use. The issue of medicalization in contemporary Western society, while a biopolitical device has weakened the human being into what you can be more powerful, ie, the relationship with others and with yourself, what Foucault calls self-care and can be explained as a particular and vehemently attention to the body. During the execution of this work meetings with a group of users of a municipal pharmacy Piracicaba were performed in order to understand how they perceive and understand patients and what they do to feel better, with the intention of the authors to contextualize support to my reflections. Therefore, I intend to defend in this work, the importance of the pharmacist's role as an educator since his area of expertise is extensive in the field of health promotion and their specific knowledge in the area will provide a basis for social action directed to instruct and guide users drugs so as to become able to take responsibility for their own health modifying ways of living and thus promote their own health and conditions for the development of a healthy society
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.018 | 0.022 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.011 | 0.018 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".