MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015078678

The significance of forest cover, topographic position and some meteorological variables for throughfall of rain under a balsam fir forest in western Newfoundland

2004· dissertation· en· W7015078678 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2004
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
FundersCanadian Forest ServiceU.S. Forest Service
KeywordsThroughfallBalsamCanopyTree canopyPrecipitationMoorlandHydrology (agriculture)Flux (metallurgy)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Throughfall, the process of rainfall passage through a tree canopy to the forest floor, is a major water flux in the forest hydrological cycle. Balsam fir has not been studied for this flux in western Newfoundland where it is the predominant tree species. -- Data were collected from June 7 to October 7 1998 to describe throughfall magnitudes and variability. An analysis of variance model was applied to investigate balsam fir forest cover, topographic position and interaction of these factors on throughfall receipt. A sample size of 36 plots for incident rainfall and 36 for throughfall was monitored during the study. Correlative relationships with meteorological variables recorded by a on-site data logger system were also investigated. -- Balsam fir forest cover was found to be the predominant variable influencing throughfall flux on a seasonal basis, with the throughfall percentage averaging 85% of incident rainfall over 28 discrete rainfall events. High inter-event variability in throughfall flux was found and is attributed to differences in the character of the rainfall events over the study duration. Topographic position was not significant on a seasonal basis. Significant meteorological influence amongst collections was detected. Air temperature, relative humidity and wind speed were not correlated with the throughfall magnitudes. Weighting of rainfall amounts and intensities did exhibit significant correlation. Analyses of wind direction at the plot level demonstrated significant windward and leeward effects on throughfall magnitudes. The throughfall process was dominated by canopy saturation and a steady state drip, although minor occult precipitation influences were observed. An exceedance of throughfall over incident rainfall was also observed, indicating the presence of non steady state throughfall regimes for balsam fir forest cover.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Same topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207