MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015099272

The roles of ccf-1 and pal-1 genes in aging and stress resistance of Caenorhabditis elegans

2023· dissertation· en· W7015099272 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan) · 2023
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInnovations in Medical Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCaenorhabditis elegansGeneModel organismTranscriptional regulationGene expressionFight-or-flight responseRegulation of gene expressionOrganismRegulator
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CCR4-NOT complex is a critical regulator of gene expression involved in multiple cellular processes, including transcriptional regulation, RNA metabolism, and stress responses. In this thesis, I investigated the role of ccf-1, a component of the CCR4-NOT complex, in stress responses and its necessity for normal lifespan and its implications in various pro-longevity signaling pathways in C. elegans. Through my experiments using environmental stressors such as cadmium and acrylamide, I measured several stress-responsive gene expression levels and observed that ccf-1 is required for stress-induced transcriptional changes in the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans. Additionally, I found that the ccf-1 gene plays an important role in the lifespan of several long-lived mutants, highlighting its significance in the aging process. I also showed that other components of the CCR4-NOT complex are also involved in promoting proper transcriptional response to environmental stressors. Furthermore, my research led to the discovery of the PAL-1 protein as a novel transcriptional factor involved in stress response with pleiotropic effects, demonstrating additive impacts when interacting with the ccf-1 gene. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms governing stress responses and aging in C. elegans and may have broader implications in unraveling similar processes in higher organisms, including humans.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity Library (University of Saskatchewan)Same topicInnovations in Medical EducationFrench-language works237,207