MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015139332

Seismic reflection results from CESAR

2016· other· en· W7015139332 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHelmholtz-Zentrum für Polar-und Meeresforschung (Alfred-Wegener-Institut) · 2016
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsGeological Survey of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBasementSedimentary rockReflection (computer programming)RidgeBedrockSedimentary structures
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The seismic re.fiection information collected on CESAR is presented to provide a continuous record of sedimentary horizons and basement relie.lThe sedimentary re.flectors on the highs are.flat lying and layered while those in the topographic lows are less regular and probably slumped.Faults predate and postdate the sediment.The age of" the Alpha Ridge is estimated.fromits magnetic character and.fossil information .The ridge's topography, sedimentary and basement structures and bedrock samples resemble those of" an oceanic plateau.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.161
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.002
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0050.001
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.073

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it