Seleção de clones canadenses de batata para caracteres agronômicos e de qualidade de fritura, no Sul do Brasil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The strong demand in the Brazilian potato chain for processing frozen French fries varieties, lead us to evaluate the adaptation of Canadian potato clones to the south of Brazil. We evaluated eleven clones belonging to the Center de Recherche Les Buissons, QB, Canada, and the cultivars Asterix and Markies (controls). Experiments were carried out in Pelotas, RS, and Canoinhas, SC, Brazil, in the spring season of 2019. The experimental design was a completely randomized blocks with four replications of plots composed by two rows with 10 plants each. Agronomic and frying quality traits were evaluated. Component traits of tuber yield and of frying quality, plant vigor and maturity were evaluated. Besides, in Pelotas, late blight (Phytophthora infestans) incidence was assessed. Individual and jointly variance analysis of variance, grouping of means and correlation analysis were performed on the data. The clone BGB 476 stood out for high tuber yield, mainly in Canoinhas, as well for good fry quality. The BGB 476 clone stood out for agronomic traits and for frying quality traits
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".