MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015216346

In-situ performance of stratified air distribution systems in two Canadian buildings

2009· other· en· W7015216346 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) · 2009
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisplacement ventilationASHRAE 90.1Thermal comfortVentilation (architecture)Natural ventilationSpring (device)HumidityAir velocity
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the assessment of stratified air distribution systems based on measurements of thermal comfort and ventilation effectiveness, during the winter, spring and summer of 2008. The Displacement Ventilation (DV) system, installed in an auditorium, uses low velocity sidewall diffusers. The Underfloor Air Distribution (UFAD) system, installed in a large public library, uses swirl type floor diffusers. In-situ monitoring of thermal parameters has been carried out following the ASHRAE Standard 113-2005. In addition, a survey of occupants' comfort was performed. The overall performance of both ventilation systems is good and consistent with typical stratified system performance indicators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa))French-language works237,207