“Sempre fui obediente, mas não pude resistir”: narrativas de mulheres musicistas em rodas de samba do Rio de Janeiro
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente trabalho se propõe a pesquisar rodas de samba compostas exclusivamente por mulheres musicistas no Rio de Janeiro, tendo como estudo de caso dois grupos específicos formados a partir dos anos 2000, o Moça Prosa e o Samba Que Elas Querem. Como principal metodologia, adotou-se entrevistas de História Oral, associada a pesquisas de campo nos eventos organizados pelos grupos supracitados e em suas redes sociais. Buscou-se compreender as motivações para entrada profissional no samba e a criação de grupos exclusivamente de mulheres. Além disso, discutiu-se questões relacionadas à busca por protagonismo das mulheres em um universo marcadamente masculino, como as rodas de samba, feminismo e atuação contra o racismo. Como produto desta pesquisa, propõe-se a publicação de um livro voltado para o grande público e que tem como base as entrevistas gravadas com as integrantes de ambos os grupos.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".