Sentinel surveillance of emergency department presentations\nfor barbecue brush-related injuries: the electronic Canadian\nHospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program,\n2011 to 2017
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A barbecue (BBQ) brush is a common household item designed for cleaning grills used\nfor barbecuing. Data from the electronic Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and\nPrevention Program database were analysed to estimate the frequency of injuries related\nto BBQ brushes as a proportion of all injuries, as well as to describe characteristics associated\nwith such injury events. Between April 1, 2011 and July 17, 2017, BBQ brush\ninjuries were observed at a frequency of 1.5 cases per 100 000 eCHIRPP cases (N = 12).\nFindings suggest that in addition to risks associated with the ingestion of loose BBQ\nbrush bristles attached to foods, loose bristles could also result in injury via other\nmechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".