MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7015387408

A stress-strain model for polycrystalline ice with application to ice-structure interactions

2003· article· en· W7015387408 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYield surfaceYield (engineering)Constitutive equationCrystallitePlasticityFunction (biology)Constant (computer programming)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A visco plastic constitutive model for polycrystalline ice is developed using the results of set of laboratory cyclic tests. The equations of the model were developed on the basis of a modified version of the classical theory of plasticity. The effect time and temperature on the mechanical plastic behaviour of ice were included.The model does not have a yield surface or a yield criterion; it uses a non-associative plastic potential function to formulate the plastic-stress strain behaviour of the ice. The model describes the behaviour of ice subjected to any loading path, including cyclic loading conditions. The model formulation accounts for the material non-linearity, time and temperature dependency, plasticity, material anisotropy, and hysterisis behaviour of ice when subjected to cyclic loading.An evaluation of the model was conducted to verify the capability of the model to predict the observed behaviour of ice. The model predictions of cyclic test results were in good agreement with the experimental measurements. The cyclic hysterisis stress-strain loops, and accumulated permanent strains were predicted very well.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNPARC→Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→