Silver Angel and Apollo X: A Glimpse into Nadina Mackie Jackson's Canadian Bassoon Concerto Project
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There are two components to this project: a video documentary and a paper. The documentary, entitled "Silver Angel and Apollo X: A Glimpse into Nadina Mackie Jackson’s Canadian Bassoon Concerto Project," introduces Nadina Mackie Jackson’s career as a solo bassoonist and follows preparations for the premieres of Silver Angel and Apollo X. The paper focuses on Nadina Mackie Jackson’s career as a solo bassoonist and Paul Frehner’s Apollo X. Video Documentary Parts: 1 Introducing Nadina Mackie Jackson; 2) Meet Paul Frehner and Constantine Caravassilis; 3) Preparing to Write for the Bassoon; 4) Writing the Concertos: 5) The Nitty Gritty of the Concertos; 6) The Premieres; 7) On Being a Solo Bassoonist; 8) Final Thoughts. All eight parts are available as one zip file by clicking on the link under "Link(s) to data and video."
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.072 | 0.013 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".