Study of the Decay <i>B</i><sub><i>s</i></sub><sup>0</sup> → <i>D</i><sub><i>s</i></sub><sup>(*)</sup><i>D</i><sub><i>s</i></sub><sup>(*)</sup>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a study of the decay Bs0 → Ds(*)Ds(*) using a data sample corresponding to 1.3 fb-1 of integrated luminosity collected by the D0 experiment in 2002–2006 during run II of the Fermilab Tevatron collider. One Ds(*) meson was partially reconstructed in the decay Ds→ φμν, and the other Ds(*) meson was identified using the decay Ds→ φπ where no attempt was made to distinguish Ds and Ds(*) states. For the branching fraction Br(Bs0 → Ds(*)Ds(*)) we obtain a 90% C.L. range [0.002; 0.080] and central value 0.039-0.017+0.019(stat) -0.015+0.016(syst). This was subsequently used to make the most precise estimate of the width difference ΔΓsCP in the Bs0 - B&#;s0 system: ΔΓsCP/ Γs = 0.079-0.035+0.038(stat) -0.030+0.031(syst).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.035 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.050 | 0.052 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.047 | 0.032 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.021 | 0.042 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.024 |
| Open science | 0.052 | 0.037 |
| Research integrity | 0.023 | 0.027 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".