MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7015451804

“Something more than a portrait”: Antoine Benoist’s wax sculpture in Louis XIV’s France

2024· dissertation· en· W7015451804 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2024
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsSculptureAssemblage (archaeology)WaxPaintingPhotography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Something More than a Portrait": Antoine Benoist's Wax Sculpture in Louis XIV's FranceNothing remains of Antoine Benoist's Cercle royal, a display of life-scaled wax figures, bewigged and clothed, on view in Paris over the course of Louis XIV's reign.Only one of Benoist's wax fabrications survives, a profile relief depicting Louis XIV in old age (Chateau de Versailles, c.1705).This singular royal portrait has fascinated and confounded commentators for its seemingly irreverent depiction of the king's scarred and wrinkled skin in the visceral particularity of polychrome wax.This dissertation examines the reception of Benoist's waxworks, which were alternately celebrated as vivid miracles or derided as deceitful trivialities.The contested verisimilitude of Benoist's sculptural practice provides an informatively problematic case for considering complications of replicative materiality for both art theory and royal representation under absolutism.In his seemingly commonplace account of melting wax, Descartes was also writing himself into the lineage of canonical philosophical inquiry.Aristotle's model of wax impression as a metaphor for sensory perception was repeated and developed by a series of prominent thinkers over centuries.4 Aristotle presented wax at key moments in his treatise on the soul, De Anima, to characterize the mind's fluctuating streams of thought and perception.He compared the intellect's latent potential to a yet untouched grammateion, a writing tablet painted with a layer of wax, designed to be etched with a stylus.This metaphor was sublimated in subsequent philosophical tradition through the Latin translation of grammateion as tabula rasa.5 The material specificity of Aristotle's image for sensory perception, of a signet ring impressed in wax, was the subject of prominent interest and commentary for subsequent generations of readers.6 Within this sequence of citations, however, Descartes inverted the analogy.It was not the mind that was impressionable as warm wax, formed in relation to the world perceived, but objects of apprehension that were given shape by the mind's schemas of comprehension.Wax's vulnerable solidity rendered it a potentially persuasive model of uncertain physicality.Toward the meditation's conclusion the narrator states that all observations on wax "may be applied to "everything else that exists outside of me." 7 Descartes's piece of wax is a metonym of materiality, in the sense that it is a small fragment that encapsulates a wide associative sphere.8 In this case, the sample is apt for demonstrating broader contradictory dynamics underlying our perception of matter.Like Descartes's scrutiny of one piece of wax (albeit hypothetical) as an informative, problematic sample of the material sphere, this dissertation concentrates on one wax object to investigate problematics of early modern materiality.My primary focus is Antoine Benoist's 1705 wax profile relief depicting Louis XIV (fig.0.1).It is the only surviving wax fabrication of a portraitist who 4 Didi-Huberman, "Wax Flesh, Vicious Circles," 64; Hecker, "Sealed between Us," 17. 5 Agamben, "Bartleby, or On Contingency," 244-45.6 Thomas Aquinas, for example, referenced Aristotle in comparing visual perception to the transfer of a seal's metallic image to wax.See Camille, "Before the Gaze," 209-10.7 Descartes, Meditations, 30.8 Susan Stewart demonstrates the referential dynamics of metonymy in On Longing, 136.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.138
Threshold uncertainty score0.274

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0140.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)→Same topicHistorical Art and Culture Studies→French-language works237,207→