MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015465953

Student Mental Health Framework: A Guide for Supporting Students in Distress

2009· report· en· W7015465953 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueCarleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) · 2009
Typereport
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMental healthSet (abstract data type)DistressMental health serviceService (business)Mental distress
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Many people at Carleton come into contact with students in distress. The protocols listed in the Framework support our community in its effort to provide students with a safe and supportive environment in which to learn. These policies and protocols comprise a set of guidelines to help ensure that students in distress receive prompt, responsive and appropriate help and that those who support them can do so with confidence. In 2009, Carleton implemented the award-winning Student Mental Health Framework, the first in Canada. The following policies and protocols are outlined in the Framework:
\n
\n* Identifying and responding to students in distress
\n
\n* Communication and documentation
\n
\n* New service policy for non-registered “students”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.359
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0060.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.004
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCarleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University)French-language works237,207