Structural analysis of the lipooligosaccharide-derived oligosaccharide of Histophilus somni (Haemophilus somnus) strain 8025: Carbohydr.Res.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Previous structural studies in our laboratory on lipooligosaccharide (LOS) inner core oligosaccharide (OS) had identified structures from several strains of Histophilus (Haemophilus) somni (738, 2336, 1P, 129Pt). Recently a type strain 8025 was proposed for this species and we therefore sought to determine the core OS structure of this H. somni strain. Core OS was isolated by standard methods from Westphal purified LOS. Structural information was established by a combination of monosaccharide and methylation analyses, NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. The following structure for the core OS was determined on the basis of the combined data from these experiments: [carbohydrates: see text]. The structure determined contains aspects of other Histophilus somni core OS structures, such as the beta-Gal attached at the 2-position of Hep II (2336), PEtn only at the 6-position of Hep II (738, 129Pt) and a lactose extension from Hep I (1P). Since genetic manipulation has been achieved with this strain, the identification of the core OS structure will enable experiments designed to identify the role of glycosyltransferases involved in LOS biosynthesis
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".