Teachers perception towards students performance with regard of the facilities in rural schools / Lydia Michael and Muhammad Aizat Ramlie
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nowadays, advanced facilities become more important due to demand from people for receiving better services from the government organizations. The purpose of conducting this study is to investigate the perception of teachers towards student's performance with regard of the facilities in rural schools at SK Tinambak, SK Buayan, and SMK Pekan Tamparuli, Sabah. The population of this study was all the teachers in SK Tinambak, SK Buayan and SMK Pekan Tamparuli, Sabah. At the time of the distribution of the questionnaires, there were 95 of teachers been targeted to answer the survey. To concluded teacher's perception towards student's performance was highly influenced by the facilities to score better in academic which shows that almost three quarter of the respondents are very optimized in student's performance and facilities is correlate. While for the significant difference to student's perception and facilities, the findings explained that teacher's perception was very optimized to students was highly dependent on the facilities of the classroom to learn comfortably. Thus, student's performance can be increase by having facilities in rural schools, the more sufficient facilities it can be better result and increase student performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".