Taking Stock, June 2010 : An Update on Vietnam's Recent Economic Development
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Vietnam has navigated the global crisis \n better than many other countries. GDP grew by 5.3 percent in \n 2009, accelerating to 6.9 percent in the last quarter of the \n year. At 5.8 percent, the figure for the first quarter of \n 2010 was less impressive, but claims that growth has slowed \n down are most probably unwarranted. Exports declined in \n 2009, for the first time since the beginning of economic \n reforms, but their decline was smaller than in other \n countries of the region. By now export growth is converging \n back to the 30 percent annual growth rate observed before \n the crisis. Inflation, which had reached 19.9 percent in \n 2008, was down to 6.5 percent in 2009. While there were some \n worrying signs of inflation acceleration in late 2009 and \n early 2010, by now the monthly increase of the Consumer \n Price Index (CPI) is again moderate. And as in previous \n years, there were no banking crises despite the continuation \n of macroeconomic turbulence. More generally, lack of clarity \n by markets forces the government to overshoot in its policy \n reactions. Because markets are not sure to understand what \n the government is up to, they need to see very strong action \n in order to be convinced that the right course of action has \n been taken. As a result, Vietnam has had to go through \n dramatic shifts in the policy stance as circumstances \n changed. The stabilization policies of 2008 effectively \n 'killed' the real estate bubble and brought \n inflation rates to zero in just a few months, but such speed \n took a toll on economic activity. The stimulus policies of \n 2009 were equally strong and determined, but they ended up \n putting too much pressure on international reserves. With \n more information disclosure and better communication, policy \n shifts could perhaps be less extreme. Combined with stronger \n macroeconomic management, it should be possible for Vietnam \n to gradually free itself from the 'stop-and-go' \n cycle that has characterized macroeconomic policies over the \n last three years.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.013 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.016 | 0.007 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.034 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it