Terapia a través del arte usando el modelo de estudio abierto con un grupo de estudiantes de psicología
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mindfulness is conceptualized, based on the Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS), as a twodimensional concept that includes attunement to the present experience with an attitude of openness, curiosity and non-judgment. The current study is an effort towards a standardized method that promotes mindfulness in art therapy. The Open Studio Project (OSP) has been adapted according to mindfulness meditation practices to enhance mindfulness as a state and to analyze the quality of the experience in a group of psychology students from a university in Lima who assisted to four art therapy sessions. The Toronto Mindfulness Scale (TMS) was used to measure mindfulness as a state, that could increase from pre-test (session one) to post-test (session four) and through the sessions. A qualitative questionnaire was included to understand their focus and attention to the experience of making art. The TMS statistical results indicate that there were only significant differences between the pre-test and the post-test (T-Student t(12)=-2.81, p<.05) and through the sessions for the decentering factor (Repeated Measures Anova, F=4.85, p=.05). Taking into account the descriptive results as well, it is suggested that art therapy using the OSP worked as concentration meditation for a group of the participants and as a mindfulness meditation for the other. Limitations and suggestions for further studies are included.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.024 | 0.032 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".