MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7015742321

Transition Metal-Free Hydrosilylation and Hydroboration of Unsaturated Carbon-Heteroatom Bonds

2023· other· en· W7015742321 on OpenAlexfundno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University) · 2023
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBrock University
KeywordsHydrosilylationHydroborationTransition metalBoraneCatalysisReagentAldehydeAmine gas treating
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The hydrosilylation or hydroboration of unsaturated C-O and C-N bonds yields valuable reagents and intermediates for organic synthesis. Traditionally, these reactions have been carried out by transition metal catalysts which are generally expensive and toxic, or stoichiometric reagents which produce a significant amount of waste. As such, transition metal-free catalytic alternatives have steadily gained popularity as a more sustainable alternative. This thesis presents the use of cheap and readily available simple alkali metal bases such as KOtBu and nBuLi as powerful catalysts for the reduction of carbonyls and imines. Notably, aldehydes can be selectively obtained through the reduction of tertiary amides and esters, and amines can be produced from nitriles using a similar method. These conversions have previously been relegated to the domain of late transition metal catalysts. Variation of the silane or borane was found to be highly influential in adjusting the chemoselectivity. For example, in the conversion of amides to aldehydes, use of (EtO)3SiH resulted in overreduction to the amine product, whereas (EtO)2MeSiH allowed for selective reduction to the aldehyde equivalent. In this work, we discuss our investigations into the scope and selectivity of this straightforward yet effective system. Additionally, we introduce a new approach for achieving long-term precise control of reaction conditions at low temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.177
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrock University Digital Repository (Brock University)→French-language works237,207→