MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015742376

Thermal Management System for Hydrogen Fuel Cell Vehicle Based on Transcritical CO2 Heat Pump

2023· article· en· W7015742376 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy managementEnergy conservationHydrogen fuelThermal management of electronic devices and systemsThermalThermal energyHydrogenGreenhouse gas
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals have been set, and the Kigali Amendment to the Montreal Protocol has officially come into force. The vigorous development of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles has become an important means of energy conservation and emission reduction in the transportation sector. Nevertheless, current fuel cell vehicles have problems including a narrow operating temperature range, the greenhouse effect produced by the thermal management working fluid, and low efficiency owing to the independent thermal management system. Thus, based on a transcritical CO2 heat pump, a novel thermal management scheme was proposed that uses multiple control algorithms and combines the thermal management systems of vehicle cabins and proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFC). AMESim was used to simulate this system. After a comprehensive analysis, the results showed that the integrated thermal management system can ensure that the cabin and battery quickly reach and maintain their respective ideal temperature. Compared with a traditional independent thermal management system, the new system has better energy utilization efficiency over the entire operating range, with greater overall efficiency and energy savings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.441
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Same topicRefrigeration and Air Conditioning TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207