MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015759869

THE TYPICAL STATE MEDALS AND REWARDS AS AN OPTION OF ENCOURAGEMENT OF ODESA CITY MAYORS IN THE CITY SELF- GOVERNMENT STRUCTURE WITHIN THE PERIOD FROM THE SECOND HALF OF THE 19TH CENTURY TO THE BEGINNING OF THE 20TH CENTURY

2023· article· en· W7015759869 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Scientific Issues of Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University Series pedagogy · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Behavioral Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Period (music)Government (linguistics)Power (physics)Christian ministryWork (physics)CommissionQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers one of the possible characteristics for encouraging the activity of historical figures in the professional field as awards and honors. Preference was given primarily to the state award system, which extended to various sectors of the population, including professional groups – elected positions of city mayors. In the second half of the 19th – at the beginning of the 20th century the municipal self-government of Odesa was headed by nine people – Semen Vorontsov, Mykola Novoselskyi, Grigory Marazli (Grigorios Maraslis), Valerian Ligin, Petro Kryzhanovskyi, Pavlo Zelenyi, Vasyl Protopopov, Mykola Moiseyev and Borys Pelikan. On the basis of the collected sources and the works of researchers, a list of the most typical state orders among the figures of city heads with a chronological reference and brief generalizations regarding the conditions of awarding was revealed. With the beginning of the creation of the post of city mayor, the duties performed did not provide for a normalized and regular financial reward, which is one of the motivating elements in the work process of a person. Awards were one of the options for encoura- gement – thanks from the government, provincial administration, national awards, distinctions, etc. According to the City Regulation of 1870, to represent the power and status of the mayor, was introduced a badge with the image of the city coat of arms on a large silver chain, with the right to the 5th category uniform of the Ministry of Internal Affairs to the heads of provincial cities and cities that were equated to them. Over the years of their life and various activities, Odessa mayors could receive many awards and distinctions that affected their status and position. Among the typical national awards, the following three orders were identified: St. Volodymyr (2nd and 3rd degrees), St. Anna (1st, 2nd and 3rd degrees) and St. Stanislav (1st degree). During the years of activity in the post of mayor, only five people received orders – M. Novoselskyi, G. Marazli, V. Ligin, M. Moiseyev and B. Pelikan. P. Zelenyi worked for a long time in self-governing institutions at the zemstvo level. P. Kryzhanovskyi and V. Protopopov are known for their professional judicial career, which contributed to receiving orders. The first mayor of the post-reform period, S. Vorontsov, was a military man, and he won his main awards on the battlefield.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.393
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it