MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015763078

Three Studies at the National Postal Museum: Summer Visitors, Postal Inspectors, Trailblazers and Trendsetters

2015· other· en· W7015763078 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueDSpace Repository (Smithsonian) · 2015
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Postal Museum
KeywordsVisitor patternQuarter (Canadian coin)
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Th e Offi ce of Policy and Analysis (OP&A) was pleased to undertake three studies at the National Postal Museum (NPM).Th e goal of the fi rst of these studies was to understand the characteristics and experiences of summer visitors as they exited the Museum.Th e other two studies were evaluations of two NPM exhibitions, Trailblazers and Trendsetters: Th e Art of the Stamp and Postal Inspectors: Th e Silent Service.Th e data for the studies came from interviews with visitors.We appreciate visitors' willing participation in these studies.Th e time they provided, in the midst of a summer visit, is evidence of their aff ection for the Smithsonian and interest in improving the visitor experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDSpace Repository (Smithsonian)French-language works237,207