MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7015803703

Viagem e naufrágio de uma nau da carreira da Índia: o caso da São Francisco Xavier (1623-1625)

2019· article· pt· W7015803703 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Estudos Anglo-Portugueses/Journal of Anglo-Portuguese Studies · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory of Colonial Brazil
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFederation for the Humanities and Social Sciences
KeywordsTourismContext (archaeology)ImmigrationGerman
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The So Francisco Xavier carrack ran aground and sank on the Tagus river bar in October 1625, causing death by drowning of more than 30 people.In this study, we will take into account the entire journey of this ship, which set sail for the Indian Ocean in March 1623, apparently piloted by Aleixo da Mota, until it shipwrecked.The attempts to recover the goods and guns it was carrying will also feature in this piece.At the same time, special attention shall be given to the archaeological data that have been disclosed recently, as well as the controversy surrounding the supposed archaeological discovery of this ship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.298
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it