Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper aims to probe the socio-cultural meaning of Roland Barthes’ studies about sports and their communicative impact on audience. To the fore is the relationship between semiology, sociology of culture and communication, in the era marked by the transformation of sports in a contemporary myth, bolstered by media innovations. In particular, the paper focuses on the texts arranged by Barthes for the Canadian director Aubert Aquin who asked the former to help him in the making of his documentary focused on the social dimension of sports. Barthes’ Les sport et les homes (1960-1961) poses as a prosecution of Mythologies (1957). In this sense, the paper outlines a socio-cultural reflection on the social impact of two specific sports, catch and cycling, interpreted by Barthes in accordance with his semiological and aesthetic sensitivity. The main purpose is to demonstrate how sports turned into a real collective show in the era of connected and reticular interactions, marked by the symbolic complexity of our post-modernity. For this reason, Barthes can help us understand the sociological shifts fuelled by the consumer society in the field of mass entertainment that sports keep on influencing and animating.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it