MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7015845064

Ãvaluation du recours au test génétique chez les personnes à risque de la dystrophie myotonique au Saguenay-Lac-St-Jean

2001· other· fr· W7015845064 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada) · 2001
Typeother
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationValidation testTest (biology)Poison control
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (SLSJ), le Complexe Hospitalier de la Sagamie offre un programme de diagnostic présymptomatique de la dystrophie myotonique (DM) depuis 1988. Depuis le début du programme, 86% des personnes à risque ont été trouvées non-porteuses et 14% ont été trouvées porteuses de la mutation. Ce projet vise à décrire le profil sociodémographique de la clientèle et à évaluer le bien-être psychologique actuel de ces individus. Pour ce faire, un questionnaire leur a été adressé par courrier. Ce dernier comprenait des questions utilisées par les enquêtes Santé-Québec sur les mesures de détresse psychologique et de la perception de l'état de santé. Au moment du questionnaire, soit en moyenne cinq ans après le résultat du test génétique, le niveau de détresse psychologique ainsi que la perception de l'état de santé étaient similaires chez les porteurs et les non-porteurs du gène et comparables à l'ensemble de la population du SLSJ. \n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.051

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.164
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLibrary and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)→French-language works237,207→